Math Lab
Home/Class X/Ch 1/Revisiting irrational numbers

Revisiting irrational numbers

A rational number is one that can be written as pq\dfrac{p}{q}, where p,qp, q are integers and q0q \ne 0. An irrational number is a real number that cannot be written this way. The classical examples are 2\sqrt{2}, 3\sqrt{3}, 5\sqrt{5}, π\pi, and ee. In this section we revisit why such numbers exist and learn the standard proof technique: proof by contradiction.

The key lemma

Lemma. Let pp be a prime number. If pp divides a2a^2, where aa is a positive integer, then pp also divides aa.

This is a direct consequence of the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic. Write aa as a product of primes: a=q1q2qn.a = q_1 q_2 \cdots q_n. Then a2=q12q22qn2.a^2 = q_1^2 q_2^2 \cdots q_n^2. By the uniqueness part of FTA, the prime factorisation of a2a^2 uses exactly the primes that appear in aa. So if pa2p \mid a^2, then pp must equal some qiq_i, i.e., pap \mid a.

This is a one-line consequence of FTA but it does all the heavy lifting in the irrationality proofs.

Theorem: 2\sqrt{2} is irrational

Theorem. 2\sqrt{2} is irrational.

Proof by contradiction. Suppose, on the contrary, that 2\sqrt{2} is rational. Then we can write 2=pq,\sqrt{2} = \frac{p}{q}, where p,qp, q are integers, q0q \ne 0, and gcd(p,q)=1\gcd(p, q) = 1 (we have cancelled all common factors).

Squaring: 2=p2q22 = \dfrac{p^2}{q^2}, so p2=2q2p^2 = 2 q^2.

Hence 2p22 \mid p^2. By the lemma (with prime p=2p = 2), 2p2 \mid p. So p=2mp = 2m for some integer mm. Substituting: (2m)2=2q2    4m2=2q2    q2=2m2.(2m)^2 = 2 q^2 \implies 4 m^2 = 2 q^2 \implies q^2 = 2 m^2. So 2q22 \mid q^2, and again by the lemma, 2q2 \mid q.

But then both pp and qq are divisible by 22, contradicting gcd(p,q)=1\gcd(p,q) = 1. The contradiction means our assumption was false. Hence 2\sqrt{2} is irrational. \blacksquare

The same script proves that 3\sqrt{3}, 5\sqrt{5}, indeed p\sqrt{p} for any prime pp, is irrational. Just replace 22 by pp throughout. The lemma needs pp to be prime; for composites it can fail (441=224 \mid 4 \cdot 1 = 2 \cdot 2 but 424 \nmid 2).

Operations: rationals and irrationals

A few useful facts:

  • (rational) ±\pm (rational) == rational.
  • (rational) ±\pm (irrational) == irrational. Proof. If r+s=tr + s = t with r,tr, t rational and ss irrational, then s=trs = t - r is rational , contradiction.
  • (non-zero rational) ×\times (irrational) == irrational.
  • (irrational) ±\pm (irrational) may be rational or irrational. Example: 2+(2)=0\sqrt{2} + (-\sqrt{2}) = 0 is rational, but 2+3\sqrt{2} + \sqrt{3} is irrational.

These let us conclude things like "3+253 + 2\sqrt{5} is irrational" without redoing the full contradiction script.

Worked examples

Example 1. Prove that 5\sqrt{5} is irrational.

Suppose 5=p/q\sqrt{5} = p/q with gcd(p,q)=1\gcd(p, q) = 1. Then p2=5q2p^2 = 5 q^2, so 5p25 \mid p^2, hence (lemma) 5p5 \mid p. Write p=5mp = 5m. Substituting, 25m2=5q225 m^2 = 5 q^2, so q2=5m2q^2 = 5 m^2, hence 5q5 \mid q. But then 5gcd(p,q)=15 \mid \gcd(p, q) = 1 , contradiction. So 5\sqrt{5} is irrational. \blacksquare

Example 2. Show that 3+253 + 2 \sqrt{5} is irrational.

Suppose 3+25=r3 + 2\sqrt{5} = r with rr rational. Then 25=r32 \sqrt{5} = r - 3, so 5=r32\sqrt{5} = \dfrac{r - 3}{2}. The right side is rational (rationals are closed under subtraction and division by a non-zero rational). But 5\sqrt{5} is irrational (Example 1). Contradiction. So 3+253 + 2\sqrt{5} is irrational. \blacksquare

Example 3. Show that 737 \sqrt{3} is irrational.

If 737 \sqrt{3} were rational, say 73=r7 \sqrt{3} = r, then 3=r/7\sqrt{3} = r / 7, which is rational. But 3\sqrt{3} is irrational , contradiction.

Example 4. Prove that 2+3\sqrt{2} + \sqrt{3} is irrational.

Suppose 2+3=r\sqrt{2} + \sqrt{3} = r with rr rational. Then 3=r2\sqrt{3} = r - \sqrt{2}. Squaring, 3=r22r2+2    2r2=r21    2=r212r3 = r^2 - 2 r \sqrt{2} + 2 \implies 2 r \sqrt{2} = r^2 - 1 \implies \sqrt{2} = \frac{r^2 - 1}{2 r} (assuming r0r \ne 0; if r=0r = 0 then 2+3=0\sqrt{2} + \sqrt{3} = 0 which is false). The right side is rational, but 2\sqrt{2} is irrational. Contradiction.

Example 5. Show that 12\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}} is irrational.

12=22=122\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}} = \dfrac{\sqrt{2}}{2} = \dfrac{1}{2} \cdot \sqrt{2}. This is (non-zero rational) ×\times (irrational), hence irrational.

Try it yourself

  1. Prove that 3\sqrt{3} is irrational.
  2. Prove that 7\sqrt{7} is irrational.
  3. Prove that 2+22 + \sqrt{2} is irrational.
  4. Prove that 5235 - 2\sqrt{3} is irrational.
  5. Prove that 15\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{5}} is irrational.
  6. If aa and bb are rationals with a+b2=0a + b\sqrt{2} = 0, show that a=0=ba = 0 = b.
  7. Can the sum of two irrational numbers be rational? Give one example.
  8. Prove that 28\sqrt{2} \cdot \sqrt{8} is rational. Reconcile with "irrational ×\times irrational".
  9. Show that 3723 \sqrt{7} - 2 is irrational.
  10. Prove that 6\sqrt{6} is irrational. (Hint: assume rational, square, use FTA on the prime 22 , or 33.)

Pitfalls / Insight

  • Always start "suppose, on the contrary, n=p/q\sqrt{n} = p/q with gcd(p,q)=1\gcd(p, q) = 1". Without coprimality the proof collapses.
  • The lemma needs pp to be prime. Trying it for p=4p = 4 or p=6p = 6 is wrong.
  • Irrational ++ irrational is not automatically irrational. Always reduce to a known irrational like 2\sqrt{2} or p\sqrt{p}.

Insight. Proof by contradiction has a beautiful shape: assume the opposite of what you want, follow the logic strictly, and let the universe tear itself apart. The contradiction proves your original claim. This pattern returns again and again in geometry, algebra, and beyond.

Practice quiz

Quick check on this topic.

Quiz
Quick check : Irrational numbers
6 questions · pick the best answer
Q1

The standard proof that 2\sqrt{2} is irrational uses:

Q2

If pp is prime and pa2p \mid a^2, then:

Q3

Which is irrational?

Q4

28\sqrt{2} \cdot \sqrt{8} is:

Q5

Sum of two irrationals is:

Q6

12\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}} is: